职权主义

通过分析民事再审规范内容并联系司法实践，归纳出我国民事再审制度的两大特点是职权主义色彩浓厚和无限再审；

Through analyzing the contents of civil retrial specification and in combination with judicial practice , the anthor concludes that the two big characteristics of Chinese civil retrial system are strong color of doctrine of function and power and endless retrial ;

我国法律的规定体现了较强的职权主义倾向，应该统一使用再审程序的概念。

Our law system reflected more doctrine of function and power tendency , so we should use the retrial procedure to replace adjudication supervision procedure and appeal for the corruption of judge .

职权主义理论主要由两部分组成：背离与弃权。

Powers doctrine consists of two parts : deviation and waiver .

我国的民事撤诉制度，原是与我国职权主义诉讼体制相适应的一项民事诉讼制度。

The system of civil withdrawing was used to traditional civil procedure mode .

我国传统的诉讼模式被认为是超职权主义的。

Our traditional model of proceeding is regarded as the super-ex officio doctrine .

主要介绍两种理论&职权主义理论与克内斯蒂尔合并学说。

The chapter mainly tells two main theories - Stewardship Theory and Christian Doctrine .

在职权主义的审前程序之上建立的对抗制的审判程序无法达到目的的根本原因，在于审前程序与审判程序之间的错位。

E. , trial procedure of adversary system mismatches pretrial procedure of inquisitorial system .

职权主义与当事人主义融合背景下我国行政审判模式的重构

Reconstruction of China 's Administrative Trial Mode in the Background of Authority and Litigant Principle Interpenetrating

而在我国，民事再审程序的制度设计具有浓重的职权主义色彩，与当前我国的市场经济对法治的要求极不相适应。

In our country , the retrial procedure is of the heavy color of inquisitorial system .

适应社会转型的要求，我国民事诉讼从职权主义模式向混合主义模式过渡。

Adapting society reforming request , Chinese civil lawsuit transited from authority principle pattern to mixed pattern .

在正当性方面，司法实践中的职权主义又可能损害当事人的诉讼权利。

In justification , the authority of judicial practice may damage the legal rights of the parties .

第二，我国职权主义法律传统存在与传闻证据规则不相适应之处。

In second , our inquisitorial legal tradition and the hearsay evidence rule does not suit place .

但无论是实行当事人主义诉讼模式的国家，还是实行职权主义诉讼模式的国家，都试图通过对撤回公诉的限制性法律规定来避免或减少撤回公诉权的滥用。

However , all countries attempt to avoid or reduce the abuse of prosecution through restrictive legal regulations .

中国行政审判模式的重构&以职权主义与当事人主义融合为背景

The Rebuilding of Chinese Administrative Adjudication Model : Under the Background of the Integration of Term and Party

这些特点，充分反映了意大利刑事诉讼中当事人主义与职权主义融合的特色。

All above reflect the peculiarity of mixing the principle by parties and by function in Italian criminal procedure .

而遵循职权主义原则则能很好地促进家事案件的公正裁判，维护家庭社会利益。

And follow the authority principle can well promote family cases of justice , the maintenance of family social interests .

协同主义民事诉讼模式是以当事人主义诉讼模式为起点发展起来的，同时吸取了职权主义诉讼模式的优点。

The civil cooperation litigation pattern is stemming from the adversary principle , and having some advantages of the authority principle .

1979年刑事诉讼法确立的刑事诉讼程序模式可以说是强职权主义的。

The criminal procedural structure established in the Criminal Procedure Law of 1979 can be described as a super-ex officio model .

我国民事再审程序由于受前苏联的影响，职权主义色彩十分浓厚。

Owing to the impact of the former Soviet Union , the civil retrial procedure of our country is strongly inquisitorial .

具体而言，笔者认为调查原则应主要包括：职权主义原则，全面调查原则，比例原则和行政正当程序原则。

More specifically , investigation principle includes legally prescribed functions and powers , investigation publicity , proportion , and fully participation .

其根本的特征就在于强职权主义、重审查主义和浓象征主义三个方面。

The basic characteristics lie in three aspects : the emphasis of the functionalism , heavy doctrine of inspecting and intensive symbolism .

受职权主义惯性思维的影响，刑事诉讼中对抗制所具有的交涉-说理机制被忽视。

Influenced by the inertia of inquisitorial thoughts , the exchange and persuasion mechanism of adversary system in criminal lawsuit is neglected .

长期以来我国的计划经济体制模式决定了我国的民事诉讼模式一直是职权主义的。

Since long ago our country 's planned economy system pattern had decided our country 's civil procedure system always is the authority system .

笔者认为，我国审前准备为典型的强职权主义模式，其特点为审前主体单一、准备行为具有行政性、审前准备的非独立性和律师介入的有限性。

It is a typical function and powers doctrine mode in our country 's pretrial . Its characteristics are : The subject is single ;

形成这种情况的原因在于强职权主义的侦查结构；传统观念的影响与中国式的刑事诉讼文化的影响。

The reasons of above-mentioned problems are investigating structure of powerful power and the influence of traditional idea and Chinese culture in the criminal procedure .

当事人主义与职权主义两大诉讼模式的较量与交融为这一趋势提供了重要的参考视角；

The conflict and combination of the litigant-centered principle and power-centered principle , two major suit patterns , provide an essential referential perspective for this trend .

大陆法系的客观证明责任制度是在职权主义诉讼中产生的一种裁判依据；

The objective burden of proof in the continental legal system is a basis for decision which emerges in the lawsuit mode of power of office .

由于我国公民权利观念淡薄与民事诉讼的职权主义模式，我国尚不具备建立证据契约制度的条件。

Because of Chinese citizen 's inactive right sense and civil litigation is Authority Orientation , the condition to found Evidence Deed system does not exist .

在全球职权主义和当事人主义两大行政审判模式融合的大背景下，我国现行的强职权主义行政审判模式日益显示出其与生俱来的弊病而不宜继续沿用。

The intending administrative trial pattern in China should be neither litigant principle nor authority principle , and supposed to choose authoritylitigant principle that extracts the both adv.

然而，我国理论界对诉讼模式的研究局限于职权主义和当事人主义，对协同型诉讼模式这一多国民事诉讼的共同发展趋势重视不够。

Domestic research pays insufficient attentions to the cooperation pattern of litigation , which is the common trend of civil litigation development in different countries at present .