语义悖论

随着研究的深入发展，逻辑悖论研究的重心自然而然转移到了语义悖论上来。

With the deepening and development of research , the focus of logical paradox research is naturally shifted to semantical paradox .

本文首先介绍悖论的定义、类型、性质、RZH解悖标准以及语义悖论的种类、产生的原因这些重要的理论基础。

Firstly , this dissertation introduces some important theoretical foundation , such as definition , types of paradox , character , the RZH criterion for paradox resolutions , types of semantic paradox and the reason for the various generations of semantic paradox .

在此基础上，通过RZH解悖标准对语义悖论的经典解悖方案和非经典解悖方案进行衡量、分析与评价，揭示了这些解悖方案的成就与缺陷。

On the basis of this , this dissertation scales , analyzes and values the classical paradox resolution scheme and non-classical paradox resolution scheme by the RZH criterion for paradox resolutions , and reveals the advantages and disadvantages of these paradox resolutions .

其它“典型语义悖论”的情况亦复如是。

Other typical semantic paradoxes are all the same as the liar .

典型语义悖论及其单义句预设

Typical Semantic Paradoxes and Their Presuppositions of Single Meaning Sentence

语言逻辑视域下的语义悖论消解

Resolutions of Semantic Paradoxes in the Perspective of Linguistic Logic

典型语义悖论之多义句本质

On the Ambiguity of Typical Semantic Paradoxes Cleft Sentence

进而，塔尔斯基提出了一种语言分层的思想来解释语义悖论。

Tarski further put forward a thought of language stratified to explain semantic paradox .

语义悖论消解研究

The Study on Resolution of Semantic Paradox

20世纪30年代初，逻辑悖论研究的重心从集合论悖论逐渐过渡到语义悖论。

In the early 1930s , the research emphasis of logic paradox was transferred gradually from set theory paradox to semantic paradox .

本文从语用学关联理论的角度对语义悖论做一个定性的研究，目的是为了寻求解决说谎者悖论的方案。

This thesis is a qualitative study of semantic paradox from a relevance-theoretic approach at the pragmatic level for the purpose of finding a solution to the liar paradox .

按照英国逻辑学家拉姆塞（F.P.Ramsey）的悖论分类，逻辑悖论可以划分为两种不同的类型：集合论&语形悖论和语义悖论。

According to the classification of the paradox of the English logician F. P. Ramsey , logic paradox can be divided into two different types : set-theory & syntax paradox and semantic paradox .

情境语义学解悖方案是近年西方语义悖论研究的重要典范，在诸多语义悖论解决方案中独树一帜。

As the important model in the research of semantic paradoxes in recent years of the West , the situation semantics solution to paradoxes develops a school of its own among many programs for semantic paradoxes resolution .

当代的某些悖论研究学者认为，某些语义悖论的背景知识中涉及语用的因素，因此建议从语义悖论中分出另一类悖论&语用悖论。

Some of the paradox researchers believed that there are some factors of pragmatic involved in the background knowledge of semantic paradox and advised to separate a new type of paradox from semantic paradox & pragmatic paradox .

由此，本文在超越对立面的世界这一时空统一的四维的逻辑系统中对语义悖论的消解问题进行研究，也就是以一种对立统一的辩证思维来把握语义悖论。

Thereout , this dissertation studies the problem of semantic paradox resolution in " transcending contradictory world " which is a space-time unitive and four-dimensional logical system , namely , holding the semantic paradox by the dialectical unity of opposites thinking .

辩证哲学以辩证思维来考察语义悖论的根源，从而揭示出语义悖论产生的根源在于对象本身的对立统一的辩证结构和人类思维不可摆脱的割离性之间的矛盾。

Dialectical philosophy explores the root of semantic paradox with dialectical thinking , revealing that the root of semantic paradox is the contradiction between the dialectical unity of opposites structure of the concrete objects themselves and the separability that human 's thought can not get rid of .