技术中性论

马克思与技术中性论的关系

Karl Marx and Technological Neutrality

技术中性论与技术价值论之争缘于对技术本质的不同理解。

The different understanding of technological essence is the ground of the discussing on whether technology is vale-neutral or value-laden .

尤其是技术价值中性论淡化了技术主体的生态意识、消解了环境责任；技术理性至上促成了技术的僭越和狂妄；技术的限定和促逼扰乱了自然过程的活动节律。

Theory of neutral technical value dissolves ecological realization of the technical objects , evades environmental responsibility . Technical rational supremacy results in arrogance . The limitation and pushing of technology disrupt the rhythm of natural activity process .

在技术非中性论者看来，现代技术在本质上是非中性的，具有先验性、普遍性、自主自律性、宗教性的基本特征，是构成支配社会历史发展和人的生存命运的惟一逻辑。

According to non-neutralists of technology , modern technology , with its nature of non-neutrality , is characterized by transcendence , universality , independence and religiousness and is the only logic that dominates social and historical development and human survival .

在技术价值观问题上，马克思并非如一些传统马克思主义者所认为的，是技术中性论的典型代表人物。

On technological value , Karl Marx is not the representative of Technological Neutrality as some traditional Marxists considered .

用技术形态论的观点，打开技术黑箱，具体分析技术的不同形态及其价值的负荷过程，有可能消解由来已久的技术中性论与技术价值论之争。

In the view of technological morphology , it is possible to clean up the lasting conflict between technology neutralism and un-neutralism by analyzing the shaping of concrete technologies and its value-loaded process inside the ' technology black-box ' .