科学革命的结构

托马斯•库恩（ThomasKuhn）的《科学革命的结构》（TheStructureofScientificRevolutions）。

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn .

其著作《科学革命的结构》中，他提出了一种新的科学发展的模式。库恩坚信科学发展的实际过程是一个进化和革命，积累和飞跃，连续和中断的不断交替的过程。

In his work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , Kuhn proposes a new model of scientific development and strongly believes that the practical course of scientific development includes evolution and revolution , accumulation and leap , continuance and breakdown , all that can be exchangeable repeatedly .

评《科学革命的结构》新译本

On the New Translation of Kuhn 's The Structure of Scientific Revolution

范式是托马斯·库恩在《科学革命的结构》中用以阐述科学发展的概念，具有强烈的科学哲学色彩。

The Paradigm , a concept with strong scientific philosophical color , is the concept used by Thomas .

库恩在《科学革命的结构》发表之后就一直致力于该论题的阐明和澄清。

After publishing The Structure of Scientific Revolution , Kuhn had to exert much effort to clarify this thesis .

从信念危机到《科学革命的结构》的诞生&库恩科学信念的转变

From Belief Crisis to the Birth of The Structure of Scientific Revolution & The Renovation of the Scientific Conviction of Kunn

第二次世界大战后，托马斯·库恩发表的《科学革命的结构》一书引发了关于对传统科学知识的大讨论。

After the second world war , Thomas S. Kuhn published a book the name of " The Structure of Scientific Revolutions " .

但他的这一论点在《科学革命的结构》以后，却有了较大的变化，由《科学革命的结构》中的不可通约变成了后来的不可翻译。

But after the publication of his The Structure of Scientific Revolution , this theory has changed considerably : incommensurability advocated in The Structure of Scientific Revolution later became untranslatability .

库恩在《科学革命的结构》一书中提出的科学革命与不可通约性思想，对哲学界产生了极为重大的影响，同时也引起了广泛的争议。

Thomas Kuhn 's ideas of the scientific revolution and incommensurability that were put forward by " The Structure of Scientific Revolution " had produced both very important influence and wide controversy to the field of philosophy .

1962年，他在《科学革命的结构》一书中提出了一种与传统截然不同的动态的科学发展模式：前科学→常规科学→反常和危机→科学革命→新的常规科学。

In 1962 , In his " Structure of Scientific Revolutions ", he presents a dynamic pattern of scientific development which is very different from the traditional pattern : the former Science → normal science → crisises and abnormals → scientific revolution → new normal science .

系统科学革命的实质是揭示结构的物质性，变革现行的物质观。

Systems science revolution transforms the current material concept of our time through the materiality of " structure " revealed by systems science .

本文应用贝叶斯检验模型重新审视库恩的范式理论，展示其中的逻辑成分或理性成分，进而说明逻辑与信念、理性与非理性在科学革命过程中的张力结构。

In this paper , I 'll apply the Bayesian schema of test to reexamine Kuhn 's theory of paradigm and show the logical or rational components in it , then proceed to expose the structure of tension between logic and belief , rationality and irrationality within the scientific revolution .

范型（paradigm）理论是美国科学哲学家托马斯·库恩在《科学革命的结构》一书中提出的，这一理论在自然科学和人文社会科学领域都得到广泛的运用。

Paradigm as the theory is widely used in natural science and social science . The theory is first introduced by Thomas S. Kuhn , an American philosopher , in his book The Structure of Scientific Revolution .

自1962年科学哲学家库恩发表《科学革命的结构》一书以来，当代西方科学哲学越来越关注科学的发展，科学发展问题成了科学动态研究的核心问题。

Since T. Kuhn published 《 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 》 in 1962 , contemporary western philosophy of science is more and more concerned about science development . The problem of scientific progress has become a core problem in dynamic research about science .

随着科学的发展尤其是库恩在《科学革命的结构》一书中范式概念的提出，传统科学的观念受到了致命的冲击。

With the development of science , especially the " paradigm " concept put forward by Kuhn , the traditional scientific development met a fatal blow .

20世纪60年代，在科学哲学的发展中，一个标志性文本即库恩《科学革命的结构》的出版，消解了科学哲学家们静态的绵延的科学发展观，从而开创了历史主义学派之先河。

A symbol text named The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was published in American in 1960s , which clear up the static and durative view of science development in scientific philosophy . From then on , the historical school in the philosophy of science came into being .