汉堡规则

汉堡规则（联合国海上运输公约）

Hamburg Rules ( U.N. Convention for the Carrier of Goods by Sea )

评《汉堡规则》的三个汉译本

On Three Chinese Versions of the Hamburg Rules

第三部分：《汉堡规则》在承运人识别问题上的改革。

Part 3 : Reform of Hamburger Rules on identification of Carrier .

《汉堡规则》和我国《海商法》对托运人有明确的定义。

In Hamburg Rules and China Maritime code ( CMC ), two types of shipper were defined .

《汉堡规则》和我国《海商法》均规定了两种托运人，即缔约托运人和交货托运人。

Two types of shipper defined in Hamburg Rules and China Maritime Code ( CMC ) are contracting shipper and consignor .

试论航海过失免责的生命力&兼对汉堡规则废除航海过失免责的理性分析

Life vitality of Exception of Nautical Fault - An analysis on the abolition of Exception of Nautical Fault in Hamburg Rules

《汉堡规则》的有关规定将为民法损害赔偿之因果关系更广泛地适用于海商法中辅平道路。

The relative provisions from < > will pave the way for the causality to be further applied to the maritime law .

在海运立法中，《汉堡规则》最先设立了此概念，我国《海商法》也参照《汉堡规则》引入了这一概念。

It was Hamburg Rules which first set up this concept in ocean shipping legislation , and then was Chinese Maritime Code .

直到《汉堡规则》才第一次在国际范围内明确规定了迟延交付的概念和责任。

Until recently , " Hamburger Rule " is the first time prescribing concept and liability of delay in delivery definitely in the worldwide .

对这一过失免责的生命力进行理性分析，同时对汉堡规则的出台的历史时机和条件提出了质疑。

The paper also questions the historical occasion and condition of the concerning the abolition of the Exception of Nautical Fault in Hamburg Rules .

目前国际上在规范海上货物运输方面并存了三个公约，分别是海牙规则、维斯比规则和汉堡规则。

Nowadays there are three international maritime conventions in the world , which are the Hague rules , the Visby rules and the Hamburg rules .

我国《海商法》借鉴了《汉堡规则》关于迟延交付的部分规定，制定了具有中国特色的迟延交付法律制度。

Chinese Maritime Code uses part of provisions of " Hamburger Rule " for reference , establishing law system of delay in delivery of Chinese characteristic .

《汉堡规则》虽废除了航海过失免责，但亦未被国际社会所接受。

< Hamburg Rule > abolished the carrier 's liability system of the < Hague Rule > , but it has not been accepted by the world community .

本文运用比较法和法解释学的方法，以《汉堡规则》和我国《海商法》的规定为依据，对实际承运人制度作一系统研究。

This paper makes a systematic study on the actual carrier on the basis of the provisions of the Hamburg Rules and Chinese Maritime Code by means of comparative law and construction of law .

通过本章分析可以看到，《海牙规则》和《汉堡规则》及我国《海商法》对承运人的界定有着本质的不同。

Notably , it analyses the same problem under the Hamburg Rules and Chinese Maritime Code and reaches the conclusion that the definitions of carrier under the two kinds of legal system are different in essence .

《中华人民共和国海商法》（简称《海商法》，自1993年7月1日起生效）在制定过程中吸收了《汉堡规则》的某些规定。

And Maritime Code of the People 's Republic of China ( hereinafter referred to as the Maritime Code ), which entered into force as of July 1 , 1993 , was drafted with reference to the Hamburg Rules .

根据《海牙规则》、《海牙-维斯比规则》、《汉堡规则》及我国《海商法》、《民事诉讼法》中的相关规定，对海运货损索赔诉讼中当事人的举证责任分配进行归纳。

Chapter Two sums up allotment of burden of proof in the litigation of marine cargo claims , combining the relevant legal provisions of Hague Rules , Hague-Visby Rules , Hamburg Rules , China Maritime Law and Civil Procedure Law .

本文旨在讨论海牙维斯比规则、汉堡规则与《中华人民共和国海商法》中关于承运人与托运人的权利、义务、责任与抗辩的有关规定。

This paper attempts to discuss lucidly the provisions relating to responsibilities , obligations , liabilities , defenses , and rights of the carrier and the shipper in Hague-Visby Rules , Hamburg Rules and China Maritime Code , as they stand .