公知技术

中药复方专利侵权诉讼中公知技术抗辩研究&兼评天士力诉万成侵犯专利权案

Defense of Publicly Known Technique in the Action of Infringement of Chinese Herbal Compound Patent : In the Perspective of a Case Study

公知技术抗辩在专利侵权案件中的适用

The Application of Prior Art Defense in Patent Infringement Case

专利侵权诉讼中的公知技术抗辩

The Widely-Known Technology Plea in the Patent Infringement Litigation

本文论述的公知技术抗辩原则就是对专利权加以合理限制的一项重要原则。

The principle of prior art plea is an important principle to restrict the patent right reasonably .

对等同原则的主张可以运用禁止反悔和公知技术进行抗辩。

It can demur by using The Doctrine of Prosecution History Estoppel and prior art to the proposition of DOE .

它还原了专利权本来应有的技术范围，将公知技术公平地还给公众，最大限度保证了专利制度的利益平衡。

It restore the original scope of patent technology protection and return prior art to the public , ensuring balance of interests in patent system .

争议与分歧意见部分主要讨论目前国内存在的公知技术抗辩认定标准和等同原则的认定标准的主要观点。

In the fourth part we will discuss the main opinion on the accredited standard of prior art defense and doctrine of equivalent in our country .

当采用公知技术抗辩时，如果被控侵权人能够证明其实施的技术方案明显属于公知技术，法院可以直接做出不构成侵权的判决，所以能够很快地结案，提高诉讼效率。

If the defendant can prove that the technology package was belong to prior art when using prior art defense , the court can make non-infringement verdict .

论自由公知技术抗辩在专利侵权诉讼中的运用对激励我国企业自主创新的思考&由跨国公司技术溢出引发的思考

Discussion on the Application of the " Unconfined Public Technique Defense " in the Action for Infringement of Patent ; On Encouraging Independent corporate Innovation in China

面对专利权人的等同侵权指控，被控侵权人并非束手无策，其可以采取公知技术抗辩，以否定侵权的成立。

Faced with the patent infringement litigation , the alleged infringer who is not helpless can defense it with prior art to deny the establishment of infringement .

同时根据诚信和公平原则，应适用禁止反悔和公知技术抗辩作为排除规则。

Meanwhile , in accordance with the principle of honesty and fairness , the doctrine of prosecution history estoppels and plea known technology shall be taken as the exclusion principle .

公知技术抗辩的制度价值在于其有利于专利权人与公众利益之间的平衡，并能极大提高诉讼效率。

The value of the Existing Art defense is that it can balance the interests of patent holders and the public , and it can greatly improve the efficiency of litigation .

公知技术抗辩是专利侵权诉讼中的一个重要原则，也是法院在专利侵权判定中必须考虑的一个抗辩事由，被控侵权人可依此原则向原告提出抗辩。

Existing Art defense is an important principle in patent infringement litigation . It is usually raised by the alleged defendant , and the court must consider the defense based on this principle .

再指出公知技术一般应当是一项是单独的技术方案，但也可以是该领域普通技术人员认为是多项公知技术的简单组合成的技术方案。

Then it points out that the prior art should be a technical solution alone , but can also be a number of public technology that is combined into a simple technical solution .

本文在对公知技术抗辩进行理论分析的基础上，结合当前司法实践中的案例，试图为公知技术抗辩在专利侵权判定中的适用寻求更加合理的法理基础和科学、完整的适用规则。

Based on the analysis of the Existing Art defense theoretically , combined with the current judicial practice , this thesis attempts to seek a more rational legal basis and establish integrated applicable rules .

公知技术抗辩就是允许被控侵权人引用任何专利申请日之前的被公众所知的技术来进行抗辩的制度。

Existing Art defense is a legal mechanism which allows the alleged infringer to raise a defense based on the fact that the patent in action is publicly known prior to the application date of the patent .

第二章通过对德国、日本、中国相关案例的整理和对比，探讨了公知技术抗辩在专利侵权判定中的适用范围。

The second chapter makes an arrangement and comparison of the relevant cases in Germany , Japan , and China firstly . Secondly , this chapter discusses the applicable scope of the Existing Art defense in patent infringement case .

但是在我国职权分开模式下，专利侵权判定中如何适用公知技术抗辩一直存在理论上的矛盾，对其具体适用规则也缺乏科学研究。

However , because of our model of separation of powers , there is a contradiction in the application of Existing Art defense in the judgment of patent infringement . There is also short of scientific research on its specific application rules .

首先介绍了现有技术抗辩的概念，现有技术抗辩又被称为公知技术抗辩、已有技术抗辩等，明确了我国采用现有技术抗辩的说法。

First , the concept of existing technology defense is introduced , and it is also known as " public technology defense " and " prior technology defense " and so on ; statement of china applying " existing technology defense " is defined .