投放危险物质罪

第三部分，论述了重大环境污染事故罪认定方面的问题。分析了本罪之罪与非罪、及其与投放危险物质罪、重大责任事故罪、危险品肇事罪等相关罪之间的界限。

Part ( 3 ) Questions on cognizing the crime this part mainly deal with the dividing lines between crime and non-crime , between the crime of major environmental pollution and other relevant crime .

本文第四部分，分析完善后的重大环境污染事故罪的构成要件，并分析完善后的重大环境污染事故罪与投放危险物质罪的在法理和实务中的辨别。

The forth part mainly deals with the constitutive elements of the perfected Crime on Major Environmental Pollution Accident , and distinguishes the crime and the Crime on Throwing Dangerous Substance in legal theory and practice .

其主观构成要件问题、侵犯的客体问题以及与投放危险物质罪等相关犯罪的区别问题，等等，多年来学界争议颇多。

For many years , the scholars have not reached the extensive common understanding on these problems , such as the subjective constitution , infringed object and the difference between the crime of throwing in dangerous substance and relevant crimes .

投放虚假危险物质罪不区分直接故意和间接故意，只要行为人实施行为时，意志因素表现为希望或放任危害结果的发生即可。

Dropping the false dangerous material sin not distinguish direct intentional and indirect intentional , as long as the actor , will conduct factors being hope or indulge harm the happening of the result can .

刑法修正案（三）第8条（刑法第291条之一），增订了投放虚假危险物质罪。

Article 8 of the Amendment III to the Criminal Law of the People 's Republic of China ( Articles 291-1 of the Criminal Law ) added a crime , viz . spreading false dangerous substances .