加害给付

然后从纵向上梳理了加害给付概念形成的历史。

And then sort out the vertical Injuring performance concept of the history .

对加害给付概念与救济的再思考

Reconsideration on Concept and Remedy for Injury Performance

论加害给付下的违约责任与侵权责任的承担

Liability for Breach of Contract and Liability for Infringement of Rights under Injuring Performance

首先，介绍和评析了加害给付责任竞合理论中的三种学说。

First , the introduction and assessment of the competing theories of liability Injuring Three doctrine .

其次，介绍了加害给付责任聚合理论，并对聚合理论与竞合理论进行比较。

Then , the aggregate liability Injuring theory , and aggregation theory and comparison of competing theories .

加害给付是合同履行过程中不适当履行的一种特殊形态，既产生了违约责任又产生了侵权责任。

Injury Performance is a special phenomenon which is not only a breach of contract but also a tort .

因此，研究加害给付理论并进而在立法中进一步完善加害给付制度，对保护消费者的合法权益、维护正常的交易秩序，有着十分重要的意义。

So , research on injury delivery aiming to perfect the system iS significant in protecting consumers and maintaining business order .

浅谈双务合同履行中的抗辩权合同法和侵权法的边界&加害给付：合同责任？侵权责任？

A Difference Between Contract Law and Tort Law & Injurious Fulfillment : Within the Ambit of Contract Liabilities or Tort Liabilities ?

本章重点从加害给付的概念和性质入手，进而明确的找到了加害给付制度在我国违约形态中的地位。

Starting from the definition and nature of injuring performance , this chapter clearly locates its position in contract breaching in China .

如允许受害人就两项请求权分别提出，则可完全实现加害给付造成的所有损害的填补，但如此就与传统责任竞合理论相违背且容易造成加害人双重赔偿；

However , it is contrary to the logic of overlapping liabilities and is easy to lead to dual compensation in that case .

产品责任是20世纪上半叶产生的新的侵权责任，它是在加害给付理论和实践的基础上发展起来的。

Product responsibility which based on the harm payments theory and practice is a new tortious responsibility born at the up leaf of the 20th century .

最后，本文对加害给付的类型化作出了自己的梳理，认为不同的加害给付类型应适用不同的请求权进行救济。

Finally , based on the type of Injuring made their own sort , that should apply to different types of Injuring a different claim for relief .

通过对责任竞合理论三种学说的分析，本文以为对于责任竞合在加害给付中的运用司法实践中存有误解。

Through the analysis of three theories of liabilities ' concurrence , the author holds that there is misunderstanding in the application of injuring performance in judicature practice .

本文在梳理传统理论的基础上，对加害给付的概念、构成要件和类型化提出了笔者的一些观点。

In this paper , on the basis of combing the traditional theory , the author made some of new points about the concept , composing elements and typology of Injuring performance .

第三部分，本文认为加害给付损害特别是因其瑕疵肇致债权人固有利益损害的情形，得基于违约之诉主张，这样于债权人利益得周全保护而言，其优势较侵权之诉至为明显。

So , all interests of creditors including interests of performance and inherent interests can be protected completely under the action of contract , which is superior to actions in tort more obviously .

第四，为了全面保护受害人的合法权益，对于加害给付导致的精神损害，应准许适用契约性救济，但应作必要的限制。

To protect the victim 's legal interest comprehensively , the remedy for breach of contract should be applied to compensation of moral damage resulted from injuring performance , but rational restriction is necessary .

第三，加害给付必然导致民事责任竞合，在解决加害给付的民事责任问题时，传统的民事责任竞合理论都有其不足之处，有限制的请求权竞合说则比较合理。

To settle the problem of civil liability of injuring performance , the traditional theories of coincidence of civil liability are defective , however , the theory of restrictive claim rights coincidence is comparatively reasonable .

第四部分，本文也对与加害给付相关的制度如产品责任、附保护第三人作用契约进行了相关讨论，并对他们的关系作了论述。

The fourth part : The thesis deals with other system , such as product liability and the contract with an additional function to protect a third party , and then discusses the co-relations of them .

对于加害给付的救济并非只能依据合同法第122条规定的责任竞合来处理，而应根据加害给付侵害的利益区别对待。对加害给付概念与救济的再思考

Not all the remedies for injury performance should be dealt with in accordance with Article 122 , but be treated differently according to the injury performance infringing the rights Reconsideration on Concept and Remedy for Injury Performance

加害给付理论被喻为法学上的伟大发现，它是伴随现代社会合同责任体系扩张而出现的合同法与侵权法的一个边际问题。

Injuring performance is considered to be " the method learn top of great detection ", it is chaperonage modern society a limit problem of the method and infringement method of the contract of system extend but emergence of the contract responsibility .

本文试图从现代社会债务体系扩张这一大背景下重新审视责任竞合理论和违约损害赔偿与侵权损害赔偿的范围划分，为消除加害给付在理论上存在的悖论作一些尝试。

This paper , in view of the framework of obligations in modern society , reconsiders the logic of overlapping liabilities and the delineation of damages of breach of contract and damages of tort so as to eliminate the irrationality arising out of injurious fulfillment in theory .

但对于在加害给付这种契约责任中产生的精神损害是否应该赔偿的问题，还有很大的争议和探讨空间，限于篇幅，本文并未对此做详细展开，只是提供了一个研究角度。

As liability for breach of contract , the spirit of harm in Injuring performance should the issue of compensation , there is still much controversy and explore space , limited space , this paper does not start to do more , only provide a research perspective .

加害给付是合同一方当事人侵害对方当事人固有利益的违约行为，构成违约责任与侵权责任竞合，受损害方有权在二者中选择其一保护其利益。

Injury performance that is the breach of contract by the party infringes upon the other 's inherent interests , causing the concurrent liabilities for breach of contract and torts , the aggrieved party shall be entitled to make a choice between two liabilities for protecting his rights .