虚假诉讼

其次，对虚假诉讼的类型作了探讨。

In the second part the types of false action were conferred .

第一部分论述民事虚假诉讼的基本问题。

The first part discusses the basic problems of civil fraud litigation .

虚假诉讼被描述为一种不正当运用民事诉讼制度的行为。

False action is described as one kind of abuse of civil procedure .

所以，虚假诉讼行为的刑法规制问题不能够绕开立法而一味地向现有法律的规定妥协。

The False lawsuit can not circumvent legislation to compromise to existing laws .

近年来，关于虚假诉讼的新闻报道频频出现在报刊之上。

In recent years , the reports about false action appeared in newspapers frequently .

然后通过分析虚假诉讼的特征，明确了虚假诉讼的内涵，廓清了其外延。

Then the meaning and extension of false action were made clear by analyzing its characteristics .

虚假诉讼不是民事诉讼法律关系，与违反诚信原则之间有区别。

Fraud litigation is not true civil litigation legal relationship , and is different from the breach of trust .

虚假诉讼主要分为利用谋取财产利益型、逃避责任型和规避法律型。

The types of civil fraud litigation are pursuing financial interests , avoiding responsibility , and evasion of laws .

三是民事诉讼法应该为虚假诉讼的受害人提供必要和完备的救济。

( c ) Civil procedure law should provide the necessary and complete relief for the victim of false lawsuit .

虚假诉讼具有缺乏对抗性、目的隐蔽性、行为违法性和危害性。

Civil fraud litigation has the following characters : lack of antagonism , concealed purpose , illegal and harmful behavior .

但同时应当看到，发生在民事诉讼领域的虚假诉讼已不再属于个别现象，且明显地呈现出蔓延趋势。

However , it should also be noticed that false lawsuits in civil lawsuits are not rare but on obvious increase .

但由于立法缺位以及理论研究滞后，致使对虚假诉讼的处理出现许多难题。

Due to absence of relevant legislation and lag in theoretical research , it is tough to handle such false lawsuits .

近年来，民事诉讼领域虚假诉讼现象逐渐引起了法律界的关注。

In the past two years , fraud litigation has raised an increasing concern among experts in the field of civil litigation .

为防范民事虚假诉讼的发生，笔者对民事虚假诉讼的概念、危害、形成原因进行了探讨。

In order to prevent the occurrence of false lawsuits , the characteristics and hazards as well as causes are discussed in this paper .

通过认识虚假诉讼的行为特征，由于当事人之间并不存在真实的民事法律关系，虚假诉讼案件在审理过程中往往会出现一些有别于正常案件的表象特征，在诉讼中往往能发现异常。

By understanding the behavioral characteristics of fraud litigation , we can identify some abnormal signals , as there are no real civil legal relations between the parties .

但是也有少数当事人利用诉讼这一形式，采取不正当手段，相互串通，虚构事实，伪造证据，企图利用民事虚假诉讼谋取不正当利益。

But a small number of parties attempt to use false lawsuits to seek illegitimate interests by improper means , family collusion , fictional facts , fabricating evidence .

虚假诉讼的产生，其原因应该是多方面的，然而，其中一个重要的影响因素乃是我国现行法律的空白。

There are many reasons on account of the false litigation phenomenon , but the most important factor of them is the lack of effective regulation in our legal system .

虚假诉讼是指行为人出于不合法之目的提起民事诉讼的，合谋向法院主张不真实案件事实的，会产生危害结果的违法行为。

False action is the behavior that the perpetrators bring a lawsuit for the unlawful purpose , and conspire to claim the untrue facts of the case , and result harm .

在民事虚假诉讼案件中，由于诉讼主体是虚设的、法律关系是虚构的、案件事实是捏造的、出具证据是伪造的。

In false litigation cases , the subject of proceedings is hypothetical , the legal relationship is fictional , the facts of the case is fabricated , the evidence issued is forged .

虚假诉讼严重干扰了法院的审判秩序，浪费大量的司法资源，侵害了他人、集体或国家的合法权益，扰乱了社会经济秩序。

These false lawsuits seriously disturb court trial order , waste plenty of justice resources , invade individual , collectivity and national legal rights and interests , and upset social economic order .

首先从现行法律规范的不完善和定性观点的理论分歧入手，分析了虚假诉讼行为刑法规制的现实障碍。

First , through analyzing the imperfection of the existing legal system and theoretical differences of determining the nature of crime , this part touches current obstacles encountered by implement of criminal regulation on false proceedings .

面对虚假诉讼泛滥的局面，驰名商标价值剩余几许，驰名商标司法认定制度又该何去何从，值得我们深思。

Facing the situation of false action flooding , how much value surplus of well-known trademark , and where to go of the judicial cognizance of well-known trademark , it is a problem worthy of our thought .

进而从刑法的谦抑性、刑罚的价值、虚假诉讼行为的发展性三个角度，分析了虚假诉讼行为刑法规制的合理性。

Then from three perspectives , namely , the restraint of Criminal Law , the value of criminal penalty and the expansibility of false proceedings , this chapter digs further into the rationality of its criminal regulation .

根据犯罪主要客体作罪名归类的通例，本文认为将此行为定为虚假诉讼罪更为合适，并应将之归入妨害司法罪中。

According to criminal charges as main object is considered in this paper , the classification of innocence , this act as " false " more appropriate action , and shall be under the hamper the judicial sin .

因此，研究、规制虚假诉讼行为，不仅是当前司法实践中亟待解决的疑难问题，而且对立法、司法以及促进社会的诚信、有序发展均具有重要的意义。

Therefore , it is of great significance to study and regulate false proceedings , which aims at solving the difficult problems faced by the current judicial practice , and promoting legislation , jurisdiction and social integrity and orderly development .

同时限制自认规则适用、加大对民事调解的监督、适当强化法院职权、建立信息共享机制，有助于提高对虚假诉讼的识别，以降低虚假诉讼的危害。

With the help of limiting applicable self-admitting rules , increasing the supervision of civil mediation , appropriately strengthening authority of courts , establishing information sharing mechanism , we can improve the detection of fraud litigations and therefore reduce its negative impacts .

所以，民事虚假诉讼案件与普通诉讼案件的表象特征并无明显异常，使国家审判机关对民事虚假诉讼案件的查处难度增大，并诱使法院做出不符合客观事实的裁判。

Therefore , false lawsuits have unusual presentation characteristics , making it more difficult for the judicial organs to investigate and deal with the false cases , and then tempting the court to make a judgment which does not meet the objective facts .

认定法院的等级过低，虚假诉讼的大量存在以及地方保护色彩的笼罩本就使得司法认定的权威遭受质疑，各地认定标准的不统一，导致的认定结果的冲突更使得司法认定认定饱受诟病。

Low levels of courts of justice , lots of false litigations , and regional protectionism have brought questioning to judicial recognition of those trademarks . Disunity of Criteria for the recognition leads to longstanding grumbles over the results of judicial recognition of those trademarks .

社会诚信缺失及道德约束下降，民事诉讼的特点，证据规则的影响，调解制度的缺陷、法官管理考核制度及惩戒制度的缺失都是虚假诉讼发生的或行为得以实施的主要原因。

Lack of society integrity , loose of moral constraints , distinctiveness of civil litigation , rules of evidence , deficiencies in the mediation system , the appraisal systems of judges , and lack of disciplinary system are main factors for civic fraud legations to occur .

虚假诉讼是滥用诉讼权利的行为，其破坏法秩序、危害司法公信力和权威、损害他人合法权益，故理应受到规制。

It is necessary to restrain this kind of action because the parties who abuse the procedure rights in a false action will destroy the legal order , and harm the credibility of justice and judicial authority , and damage others ' legitimate rights and interests .