聚众斗殴

第一部分，详细介绍聚众斗殴转化定罪典型案例，并从案例存在的争议焦点，引出本文所研究的聚众斗殴转化定罪问题。

The first part introduced affray crime cases , lead to the problem of affray crime .

对首要分子和积极参加者的处罚也要根据其在聚众斗殴罪中作用大小分清主次，分别处罚。

The punishment to ringleader and protagonist also need to distinguish primary and secondary function among the crime of affray , differentiate punishment .

聚众斗殴罪只能由直接故意构成。

The crime of affray can only be constituted with direct intention .

聚众斗殴行为发生转化的原因是主客观条件的统一。

The reason of transformation is the unification of objective and subjective respect .

榆树大街橡树大街交界处聚众斗殴。

" Brawl at Elm and Oak Intersection " .

聚众斗殴罪的主体是首要分子和积极参加者。

The subject who may commit the affray Crime is ringleader and active participant .

然后指出了研究聚众斗殴罪特定问题在司法实践中的现实意义与理论研究中的独特价值。

Then presents the particular value in academic study and jurisdictional practice to study it .

聚众斗殴罪系从修订前《刑法》规定的流氓罪分解而来。

The crime of affray is decomposed from hooliganism set by the previous Criminal Law .

论聚众斗殴罪

On the crime of gathering to assault

行为人是否具有流氓动机不应当是聚众斗殴罪的成立要件。

Whether the actor has rogue motivation should not be an essential factor of Affray Crime .

聚众斗殴罪相关问题研究聚众斗殴罪：理论与实践探讨

Relevant Issues on the Crime of Affray The Theoretic and Practical Study on Crime of Affray

聚众斗殴罪在犯罪构成上为基本构成与加重构成相结合的犯罪构成模式。

The legislature uses the model of basic elements and aggravated elements to stipulate the crime of affray .

此案中其他几名“打手”也分别因犯聚众斗殴罪被判刑。

The case in several other " thugs " were also found guilty of affray and was sentenced .

聚众斗殴罪需具有流氓动机，主观故意为互殴的故意，即双方均需具有斗殴的故意。

Affray must have rogue motivation , subjective intent to deliberately melee that both sides need to be intentional with the brawl .

主观方面为直接故意，并且聚众斗殴双方的故意具有对偶性。

The subjective element of this crime shall be direct intention , and the different parties involving in the affray shall have the same intention .

其间，两名犯罪嫌疑人为报复他人纠集多人引发聚众斗殴事件，犯罪性质恶劣影响极坏。

In the meantime , two other suspects gathered more than artificially triggered retaliatory incidents of affray , criminal nature of the bad very bad .

本文选取了近期发生的一起真实的且引起一定争议的聚众斗殴案例，对于本案例所涉及的关于聚众斗殴罪的若干法律问题作出探讨。

This paper select a recent incident of affray case that caused some controversy , in order to explore certain legal issues involved in this case .

从修订的刑法生效至今，聚众斗殴成为一种多发性犯罪，由于涉案人员众多，严重扰乱社会公共秩序。

From the revised penal code came into effect , affray become a multiple crimes , as the number of people involved , seriously disturbed social order .

本案中，邵某不宜认定为其他积极参加者；刑法第292条第2款聚众斗殴转化定罪的规定应属法律拟制。

Case , Shao should not be identified as active participants ; Paragraph 2 of Article 292 of the Criminal law should be transformed into legal fiction .

聚众斗殴罪从1979年刑法中的流氓罪分解而来，是扰乱公共秩序罪的典型犯罪之一。

The crime of affray resolved from the crime of hooligan in criminal law since 1979 , it was the model of the crime of disrupting public order .

聚众斗殴罪的主体为首要分子与积极参加者，首要分子均为主犯、积极参加者可区分主从犯。

Affray with the main body of the primary elements active participant , the primary elements are the principal , active participants can distinguish between the main accomplice .

现行《刑法》第292条规定的聚众斗殴罪，分为基础构成和加重构成，有两种刑罚幅度，并且还有聚众斗殴的转化情节，条文简单，但内涵丰富。

Affray crime stipulated by article 292 of the current Criminal Law contains the basis composes and aggravates formation mark , and has two kinds of penalties extent .

聚众斗殴罪作为聚众犯罪的一种，在司法实践中，作为共同犯罪、行为犯、转化犯认定时都引发了很多的争议。

As a kind of mass crimes , the crime of affray always causes disputes on joint crime , behavioral offense , conversion of crime in judicial practices .

聚众斗殴犯罪是近年来我国各种犯罪中比较高发的一种妨害社会管理秩序的犯罪，其具有严重的社会危害性。

Crime of affray is a model of the crime of disrupting public order , which has high incidence in recent years . It has a serious social harmfulness .

聚众斗殴行为由聚众行为和斗殴行为互相结合而成，聚众行为不具有对合性，斗殴行为具有对合性。

Acts of affray and assault by the mob behavior of each combination of behavioral , mob behavior does not have sex together , fight together acts of nature .

在认定聚众斗殴罪时，要注意罪数形态理论的正确运用。

When making judgments about the action of gathering to assault , attention should be paid to the use of the theory of the state of crime quantity correctly .

我国刑法第292条规定的聚众斗殴罪，由于该条规定过于简单粗糙，造成司法认定的困难局面。

Article 292 of the Criminal law makes provision for affray , which provides as too simple and rough , resulting in the judicial determination of a difficult situation .

考察一下聚众斗殴罪的犯罪客体可以得知，该罪是通过多数人相互斗殴的方式来对社会秩序造成损害。

Look at the criminal object of the crime of affray may know , the crime fighting each other through most of the way to cause harm to social order .

继一连串青少年聚众斗殴事件后，英国一家肯德基店被迫首次禁止青少年在无成人陪同下在店内用餐。

A KFC restaurant in the UK has been forced to issue their first ever ban on youngsters eating without adults inside the restaurant after a spate of fights involving teen gangs .

而之所以出现上述适用法律不当的情况，很重要的原因就在于对聚众斗殴罪中聚众和持械的认定不够准确。

The reason that the law applicable to the above cases of improper very important because of the Crime of the " gathering " and " armed " Recognition is not accurate enough .