维权成本

我国女职工特殊权益保护还存在着执法不严、监察不力、内容滞后、无法可依、维权成本太高等方面的问题。

At present , there are such weaknesses as weak enforcement and supervision , inadequate protection and high costs .

法院的一些规定不合时宜，没有考虑到网络侵权的特点，也增加了权利人的维权成本。

A few regulations of the court are malapropos , did not consider the characteristic of network tort , also raised the dimension authority cost of obligee .

从知识产权的角度来说，真实人物形象不是著作权的保护形象，而通过注册商标取得，会大大增加权利人的维权成本。

From the perspective of intellectual property , the right of publicity of real person is not copyright protection object and through the registered trademark will greatly increase the cost .

我国职务发明奖酬制度由于发明人或设计人与单位地位不平等、奖酬维权成本高、法律救济途径障碍等，职务发明奖酬实施难。

Our service invention reward system due to the inventor or designer and unit status inequality , reward dimension authority cost is high , the legal remedy barriers , difficult implementation of duty invention award .

通过渠道的畅通、制度的完善、程序的公正、机制的创新来降低弱势群体的维权成本，保障弱势群体的利益，进而促进社会的稳定、和谐。

Through reasonable procedures , perfect system and perfect procedural justice and innovative mechanism to reduce the right safeguarding cost of vulnerable groups , safeguard the interests of vulnerable groups and then to promote social stability and harmony .

第四章从成本&收益的经济学视角出发，提出内幕交易行为屡禁不止的根源在于违法成本过低而维权成本过高，并针对这一情况提出完善内幕交易法律规制的建议。

The fourth chapter , in the view of cost - benefit perspective of economics , talk about the reason of insider trading is low cost of illegal and high cost of rights , and put forward a sound case for the recommendation of legal regulation of insider trading .

然而，面对日益增多的惩戒纠纷，行政诉讼之路救济有限，制度障碍重重，而学生缺乏有效的救济途径，维权成本较高，因而急需建立一种高效、便捷的纠纷解决机制。

However , with more and more discipline dispute , the way of administrative litigation is limited and obstructive . The lack of efficient solution to relieve this problem and the high cost of Rights Protection ask people to set up an efficient and convenient system to solve the dispute .

证券欺诈案件具有高度的专业性和复杂性，投资者想要维权的诉讼成本很高，但是在全球范围内来说此类诉讼的收益却很低。

Because this kind of case is expertise and complexity , litigation cost is high , while such litigation income is low in the global scope .