纵向垄断协议

我国现行的《反垄断法》虽然规定了纵向垄断协议，但条款过于抽象，司法操作性不强。

The anti-monopoly law in China has regulated the vertical agreements . However , the article is too abstract and difficult to be used in practice .

我国应借鉴和吸收英美及欧盟国家在这方面的经验，在纵向垄断协议行为的列举、协议合法性判断的标准以及协议的法律责任等方面完善对其的规制。

We should develop the rule of the vertical agreements in China from the types , the assessment criterion and legal responsibility on the foundation of the experience of European countries and U.S.A.

纵向垄断协议兼具积极效果和负面效果。

Vertical monopoly agreement has positive and negative effects .

专利联营的纵向垄断协议表现形式主要有转售价格维持和排他性许可。

Vertical agreement of patent pool includes resale price maintenance and exclusive license .

专利联营能够通过横向垄断协议、纵向垄断协议、滥用市场支配地位来形成垄断。

Patent pool act through horizontal agreement , vertical agreement and abusing of dominant position .

全文共分四个章节，其主要内容概括如下：第一章，纵向垄断协议概述。

Its main contents are summarized below : The first chapter is about the overview of the vertical monopoly agreements .

公司与下游经销商达成的协议属于纵向垄断协议中的限定向第三人转售商品的最低价格的协议。

The agreement concluded by Company A and Company C and D belongs to the fixing goods prices agreement under the horizontal agreement .

对纵向垄断协议的认定和豁免的确具有其独特性，因为此类协议并不像横向垄断协议那样对竞争有普遍的危害性。

The recognition and immunity of vertical price monopoly agreement are unique , because they will cause less harm comparing with horizontal monopoly agreement .

本章首先在分析我国反垄断法和学者对纵向垄断协议界定的基础上得出了纵向垄断协议的定义。

At first , based on analyzing anti-monopoly law and scholars ' definition of the vertical monopoly agreements , I give a definition to it .

纵向垄断协议，是指处于不同生产经营环节或者链条上的企业间达成的排斥其他竞争者竞争的一种协议。

The vertical monopoly agreement refers to an agreement which is made by diverse corporation in different productive chains to keep the competition from exotic company far away .

本章在分析了我国当前社会经济状况的基础上，对我国《反垄断法》中涉及纵向垄断协议的相关规定作了自己的评价并提出建议。

It makes some comment and proposal on relevant regulation regarding vertical monopoly agreements in anti-monopoly law on basis of analyzing the situation on the present society and economy .

在早期反垄断法理论和实践中，认为纵向垄断协议会减弱品牌内部的竞争，对竞争产生消极效果，因而与横向垄断协议一样采取比较严厉的态度。

It is said that the vertical monopoly agreement contributes to the impair interior competition and make negative effect in earlier theory and practice of Antirust law , so they are banned as horizontal monopoly agreement .

纵向垄断协议作为垄断协议的一种，与横向垄断协议在行为主体、协议目的及其协议存在的方式等方面均存在不同。

As one kind of monopoly agreement , the Vertical Agreements has a lot of differences with the horizontal agreements , such as the subject , the aim and the form of existing of the agreement and so on .

纵向垄断协议在阻碍品牌内部竞争的同时，却促进了品牌之间的竞争，并用能够提高商品的售后服务和经济效率，因而不能简单地运用本身违法原则去规制。

The vertical monopoly agreement hinders the inter-competition ; however , it urges the competition among the binders as well as the increasing of after-sales service and economical efficiency . So it cannot be simply banned for its surface illegal .

但问题并不仅限于此，由于纵向垄断协议与滥用市场支配地位大都是在上下游企业之间发生的垄断行为，所以难免出现相互重合、交叉的问题。

Because vertical monopoly agreements and the abuse of a dominant position both are monopolized activities between upstream and downstream firms , it is unavoidable to come up over-lapped problems . There are maybe two different kinds of affirmations for the same action .

对于纵向垄断协议，经济学和法学界普遍认为其具有一定的积极影响，甚至可以促进竞争而没有统一的规制方式，但其对竞争的限制作用也是毋庸置疑的。

Vertical monopoly agreements are generally deemed to have a positive effect , even be good for competition in circle of economy and law . So there is not a uniform way of regulation . But we have no doubt that it also have a restrictive effect on competition .

美国、欧共体、德国反垄断法作为实施较早、已经较为成熟和完善的三种反垄断法律体系，对纵向垄断协议的立法态度较为一致，但它们在立法技术上存在各自的特点。

The Anti-monopoly Law of US , EC and Germany , which were early implemented and have become mature and perfect legal systems of anti-monopoly , are quite consistent in the legislative attitudes towards the vertical monopoly agreement and each of them has their own characteristics in legislative techniques .

判断单个纵向垄断协议是否应该被禁止，应该从其制定的目的以及具体的市场占有份额来进行合理分析，才能区分其是否有利于竞争的开展，最终维护消费者的权利。

To judge whether a sole vertical monopoly agreement should be prohibited ; reasonable analysis is required to apply to the purpose of its establishment and detailed market share . This helps to determine the possibility of the emergence about further competition and protect consumers ' rights as well .

我国认定纵向价格垄断协议时应采用合理性原则，并在豁免条件和程序上加以体现。

The recognition of vertical price monopoly agreement in China should adopt principle in terms of reasonableness and demonstrate relevant implementation regarding exempt conditions and procedures .