Protagoras

On this paper I will prove the conflicts between Protagoras and Socrates are based on the foundation of the different understanding for knowledge ;

本文将论证普罗泰戈拉和苏格拉底的冲突是一场根基于对知识的不同理解而产生的冲突，对普罗泰戈拉和苏格拉底的知识进行清理；

First establishment of the subject position of human Being-Explanation of protagoras 's well-known saying " human being is the yardstick of all things on earth "

人的主体地位的首次确立&普罗泰戈拉的名言“人是万物的尺度”阐释

Comparison and Interpretation of Philosophy of Politics Between Protagoras and Plato

普罗塔哥拉与柏拉图的政治哲学的阐释与比较

The Time Period of the Greek philosopher Protagoras , who believed that truth and knowledge are created by the mind .

希腊哲学家普罗泰格拉时期，他相信真理与知识由心灵产生。

Protagoras argued that the gods have given everyone a share in political wisdom and that all therefore are able to participate in government and achieve virtue .

普罗泰格拉认为神赋予了每个人政治智慧，因此每个人都能参与政事，获得美德。

The principle of subjectivity plays the role of a fundamental principle in traditional western philosophy . It originates in classic Greek philosophy , particularly the thought of Protagoras and Socrates .

主体性原则是西方传统哲学的一个基本原则，这一原则萌芽于古希腊哲学，尤其是普罗泰戈拉和苏格拉底的思想。

In the west , it can be dated back to as early as ancient Greek times , when Protagoras originally put forward : " human is the yardstick of everything " .

在西方，最早可以追溯到古希腊时期，普罗泰戈拉就曾提出：“人是万物的尺度”。

Socrates was not unduly alarmed by this doctrine as expressed by a moderate thinker such as Protagoras , who did not attempt to undermine the traditional laws and wisdom .

苏格拉底对普罗泰格拉这样比较温和的智者派所提出的理论并未感到不安，因为普罗泰格拉并没有贬低传统的法则和智慧。

This was , I think , because Plato , in the Theaetetus , suggests , as aninterpretation of Protagoras , that one opinion can be better than another , though it cannot be truer .

这一点我想是因为柏拉图在《泰阿泰德篇》里提示过（作为对普罗泰戈拉的一种解释），一种意见可能比另一种意见更好一些，但不一定是更真一些。